Different responsibilities. Shared project information.

The same property and drawing set raise different questions for each team. Start with the part of the project you are responsible for.

One project. Four different responsibilities.

Start with the decision each person owns, then keep the same project basis visible through the handoff.

Which site option deserves more investigation, and what assumptions could change that choice?

Which requirement and drawing condition shape the next design move?

Is the issue a verified conflict, a coordination question, or missing evidence?

Does the submitted evidence support the reported condition under the governing rules?

LinkWave supports the investigation. The responsible people still establish the basis, inspect the evidence, and determine the next step.

01
Developers and owners
Review a property, its available development controls, and preliminary options. Bring the site context and scenario assumptions into the conversation with your design team.
02
Architects
Investigate site conditions and review PDF plan-set findings. Inspect the requirement, the information extracted from the drawings, and the available location highlights before deciding on a design response.
03
Contractors and design teams
Give a coordination question a clear drawing reference. Review the reported condition and distinguish a conflict from information that needs clarification.
04
Municipalities and plan reviewers
Inspect the evidence behind software-assisted findings. Review the source and project context while retaining the jurisdiction’s formal determination and approval role.

See the workflow against the material already on your desk.